<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for the opinionation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theopinionation.net/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theopinionation.net/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:07:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Family First Vs Those pesky homosexuals&#8230; by wireless modem router</title>
		<link>http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=671&#038;cpage=1#comment-2858</link>
		<dc:creator>wireless modem router</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=671#comment-2858</guid>
		<description>Mowed the grass, installed wireless router &amp; ordered new brakes for the my car. Yep, just dominated Today. Bring it Tomorrow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mowed the grass, installed wireless router &amp; ordered new brakes for the my car. Yep, just dominated Today. Bring it Tomorrow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Family First Vs Those pesky homosexuals&#8230; by Chase</title>
		<link>http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=671&#038;cpage=1#comment-2857</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=671#comment-2857</guid>
		<description>I think that is an interesting point, it made me think a bit.  Thanks for sparking my thinking cap.  Sometimes I get so much in a rut that I just feel like a record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is an interesting point, it made me think a bit.  Thanks for sparking my thinking cap.  Sometimes I get so much in a rut that I just feel like a record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Family First Vs Those pesky homosexuals&#8230; by club penguin secrets</title>
		<link>http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=671&#038;cpage=1#comment-2856</link>
		<dc:creator>club penguin secrets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 03:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=671#comment-2856</guid>
		<description>Thats some good  fundamentals  there, already knew  some of that, but you can always learn . I doubt a “kid” could put together such information as dolphin278 suggested. Maybe he’s just attempting  to be “controversial? lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats some good  fundamentals  there, already knew  some of that, but you can always learn . I doubt a “kid” could put together such information as dolphin278 suggested. Maybe he’s just attempting  to be “controversial? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Australia MUST do: Part I by the opinionation blog &#187; What Australia MUST do : Part V</title>
		<link>http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=463&#038;cpage=1#comment-2855</link>
		<dc:creator>the opinionation blog &#187; What Australia MUST do : Part V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=463#comment-2855</guid>
		<description>[...] I: Here //  Part II: Here // Part III: Here// Part IV: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I: Here //  Part II: Here // Part III: Here// Part IV: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Australia MUST do: Part I by the opinionation blog &#187; What Australia MUST do: Part IV</title>
		<link>http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=463&#038;cpage=1#comment-2854</link>
		<dc:creator>the opinionation blog &#187; What Australia MUST do: Part IV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=463#comment-2854</guid>
		<description>[...] I: Here //  Part II: Here // Part III: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I: Here //  Part II: Here // Part III: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Australia MUST do: Part I by the opinionation blog &#187; What Australia MUST do: Part III</title>
		<link>http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=463&#038;cpage=1#comment-2853</link>
		<dc:creator>the opinionation blog &#187; What Australia MUST do: Part III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=463#comment-2853</guid>
		<description>[...] I: Here //  Part II: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I: Here //  Part II: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Australia MUST do: Part I by the opinionation blog &#187; What Australia MUST do: Part II</title>
		<link>http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=463&#038;cpage=1#comment-2852</link>
		<dc:creator>the opinionation blog &#187; What Australia MUST do: Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=463#comment-2852</guid>
		<description>[...] PART I is HERE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PART I is HERE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conroy- Corrupt, Dangerous and Stupid by Jordan</title>
		<link>http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=452&#038;cpage=1#comment-2851</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=452#comment-2851</guid>
		<description>I have been frustrated with conroy as well in regards to delays in other decisions. (good bad or otherwise) but the speculation is the pay tv will get more direct negotiation power with sports going off the anti-siphoning list whilst free to air gets money. Seems so strange and deliberate in why suddenly they are thinking there decisions through or is he waiting for a meeting with pay tv now to then mention that decision directly after that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been frustrated with conroy as well in regards to delays in other decisions. (good bad or otherwise) but the speculation is the pay tv will get more direct negotiation power with sports going off the anti-siphoning list whilst free to air gets money. Seems so strange and deliberate in why suddenly they are thinking there decisions through or is he waiting for a meeting with pay tv now to then mention that decision directly after that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010: PREPARE FOR SUCK! by the opinionation</title>
		<link>http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=425&#038;cpage=1#comment-2850</link>
		<dc:creator>the opinionation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=425#comment-2850</guid>
		<description>Whilst I welcome discussion and opinions, this is the opinionation after all, I feel I must comment on a couple of things:

Firstly, I don&#039;t and most probably won&#039;t vote for the Greens with their current policies. They are a &quot;specialist&quot; party in that their focus is on the environment and nothing (much) more. 

You said:

&quot;The only people that vote for the greens are people in the city’s that don’t live in the environment they want to protect&quot;

Accoding to electorate results, you aren&#039;t entirely correct there, the Greens got similar results in country towns to urban centres where they didn&#039;t get elected and were standing. 

I agree that for some it might be a conscience vote but, unless you are a Climate Change skeptic (read: idiot), you would thing that the Environment is in pretty poor shape and the Greens are the ONLY party with a comprehensive plan to save the environment - and only the environment. Their fiscal and social policies are all over the place, but the one thing they get right is Environmental issues.

&quot;It hasn’t stopped yourself from starting a webpage, operating a server and using more electricity and increasing your own carbon footprint.&quot;

That was a little personal. Would it make you feel better to know that I am with a web hosting company and therefore my server host hundreds of web pages and not just my own? I have chickens that provide me with eggs and fertiliser that would offset my emissions to include the 1/100th of server power I am using. How is your manually powered PC going and your car? I certainly wouldn&#039;t want to be calling the kettle black. 

The point I made I though would be obvious - but I&#039;ll explain it here:

A two party dominated system doesn&#039;t work - neither are socially liberal and neither really are downing much for carbon emissions. If the Senate and House of Reps were equally filled with Libs, Labors, Greens and Democrats we would have REAL debate and a chance that the majority of people would feel as if they are being heard and that the Government are actually working for the people. A multifaced Government is a healthy one.

While I do think the Greens are sometimes batshit insane they deserve to be heard because their message, while extreme, is what needs to be heard.

I am also confused by your motives... are you saying Brother Abbott and Big Kev should go virtually unchallenged as the push conservative Christian morals on us? While they allow industry, where most of the pollution comes from, to go on untouched?

Realistically there are only two major alternatives to gain any seats - the Greens and the Dems... nobody would seriously suggest that the Sex Party or the Liberal Democratic Party really have a hope. We need alternatives to the Liberal/Labor record. Besides it would make things alot more exciting. 

&quot;The greens there voters are the biggest hypocrites in Australian politics.&quot;

Even more than &quot;Liberals&quot; which by it&#039;s definition definition is a hypocritical title for the conservative party?

Oh and the &quot;increase in undergrowth&quot; wouldn&#039;t have been an issue if

a) People didn&#039;t live in areas where bushfires NATURALLY OCCOUR

b) Global Warming hadn&#039;t caused a spike in temperature levels and created the drought that dried the land 

and 

c) The possibility of arson

- db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I welcome discussion and opinions, this is the opinionation after all, I feel I must comment on a couple of things:</p>
<p>Firstly, I don&#8217;t and most probably won&#8217;t vote for the Greens with their current policies. They are a &#8220;specialist&#8221; party in that their focus is on the environment and nothing (much) more. </p>
<p>You said:</p>
<p>&#8220;The only people that vote for the greens are people in the city’s that don’t live in the environment they want to protect&#8221;</p>
<p>Accoding to electorate results, you aren&#8217;t entirely correct there, the Greens got similar results in country towns to urban centres where they didn&#8217;t get elected and were standing. </p>
<p>I agree that for some it might be a conscience vote but, unless you are a Climate Change skeptic (read: idiot), you would thing that the Environment is in pretty poor shape and the Greens are the ONLY party with a comprehensive plan to save the environment &#8211; and only the environment. Their fiscal and social policies are all over the place, but the one thing they get right is Environmental issues.</p>
<p>&#8220;It hasn’t stopped yourself from starting a webpage, operating a server and using more electricity and increasing your own carbon footprint.&#8221;</p>
<p>That was a little personal. Would it make you feel better to know that I am with a web hosting company and therefore my server host hundreds of web pages and not just my own? I have chickens that provide me with eggs and fertiliser that would offset my emissions to include the 1/100th of server power I am using. How is your manually powered PC going and your car? I certainly wouldn&#8217;t want to be calling the kettle black. </p>
<p>The point I made I though would be obvious &#8211; but I&#8217;ll explain it here:</p>
<p>A two party dominated system doesn&#8217;t work &#8211; neither are socially liberal and neither really are downing much for carbon emissions. If the Senate and House of Reps were equally filled with Libs, Labors, Greens and Democrats we would have REAL debate and a chance that the majority of people would feel as if they are being heard and that the Government are actually working for the people. A multifaced Government is a healthy one.</p>
<p>While I do think the Greens are sometimes batshit insane they deserve to be heard because their message, while extreme, is what needs to be heard.</p>
<p>I am also confused by your motives&#8230; are you saying Brother Abbott and Big Kev should go virtually unchallenged as the push conservative Christian morals on us? While they allow industry, where most of the pollution comes from, to go on untouched?</p>
<p>Realistically there are only two major alternatives to gain any seats &#8211; the Greens and the Dems&#8230; nobody would seriously suggest that the Sex Party or the Liberal Democratic Party really have a hope. We need alternatives to the Liberal/Labor record. Besides it would make things alot more exciting. </p>
<p>&#8220;The greens there voters are the biggest hypocrites in Australian politics.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even more than &#8220;Liberals&#8221; which by it&#8217;s definition definition is a hypocritical title for the conservative party?</p>
<p>Oh and the &#8220;increase in undergrowth&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t have been an issue if</p>
<p>a) People didn&#8217;t live in areas where bushfires NATURALLY OCCOUR</p>
<p>b) Global Warming hadn&#8217;t caused a spike in temperature levels and created the drought that dried the land </p>
<p>and </p>
<p>c) The possibility of arson</p>
<p>- db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010: PREPARE FOR SUCK! by John the Fucking Awesome</title>
		<link>http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=425&#038;cpage=1#comment-2849</link>
		<dc:creator>John the Fucking Awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theopinionation.net/blog/?p=425#comment-2849</guid>
		<description>Seriously mate, the greens helped to create one of those disaster&#039;s that you mention at the top of this column and you want them to rise?

There campaigning against back burning because it was bad for the environment considerably increased the threat of those fires on that day. They were banning farmers from grazing stock in the hills around gippsland - thus leading to an increase in undergrowth - In some instances they do more harm for the environment than they bloody help

The only people that vote for the greens are people in the city&#039;s that don&#039;t live in the environment they want to protect - They no nothing about the environment they want to protect except some koalas or some random species of parrot lives there. It is a conscience vote to make them fell better - but doesn&#039;t stop them jumping in there 4 wheel drives and cranking there aircon in there house so its cool when they get back. It hasn&#039;t stopped yourself from starting a webpage, operating a server and using more electricity and increasing your own carbon footprint. The greens there voters are the biggest hypocrites in Australian politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously mate, the greens helped to create one of those disaster&#8217;s that you mention at the top of this column and you want them to rise?</p>
<p>There campaigning against back burning because it was bad for the environment considerably increased the threat of those fires on that day. They were banning farmers from grazing stock in the hills around gippsland &#8211; thus leading to an increase in undergrowth &#8211; In some instances they do more harm for the environment than they bloody help</p>
<p>The only people that vote for the greens are people in the city&#8217;s that don&#8217;t live in the environment they want to protect &#8211; They no nothing about the environment they want to protect except some koalas or some random species of parrot lives there. It is a conscience vote to make them fell better &#8211; but doesn&#8217;t stop them jumping in there 4 wheel drives and cranking there aircon in there house so its cool when they get back. It hasn&#8217;t stopped yourself from starting a webpage, operating a server and using more electricity and increasing your own carbon footprint. The greens there voters are the biggest hypocrites in Australian politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
